Vintage Mustang Forums banner

1 - 6 of 6 Posts
G

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
What a revolting load, I don't care how much it costs! How is it that people get brain-washed by the brand name, can't you see it's a big sloppy mess, with all the tacked-on scoop nonsense? With all the amazing cars ever made, people are still rehashing the Shelby hype, gnawing on every bone he left behind. Someone explain this to me. Really, I don't understand.

-Dogfood
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
514 Posts
I can see where your coming from, but I still think the 67 GT500 looks really good. It does get a bit rediculous though, most people with the real Shelbys never drive them. I would rather have a fake car, built the way I want it, that performs well instead of trying to find the right date-coded smog equipment.

http://216.71.48.244/archive/mikecar.jpg



65 Fastback 289 4spd in storage :-(
91 CRX Si... A.K.A. my go-kart with AC!
 
G

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
Discussion Starter #4
A car should be driven!!! Just my opinion. I would rather make a fake my way, then spend all that money to have a real one on a trailer!!

65 coupe 302
(rebuilding a 351W)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,663 Posts
Hey come to missouri,,We'll go play,, My 67 GT 500 gets driven every couple days even if it is just to lunch,,JE pistons,H beam rods,fresh original(but modernized)carbs,4 speed,3:50 D locker,,how fast do you want to go??"WEEEEEEE" and still looking good

Robbie
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
762 Posts
an opinion is an opinion. I love the 67 shelby FB, big ole hood scoop and all. Same for the 69.

Don't try to understand. It's just an opinion or preference. And you know what they are like... yes, everyone has one.

JJ
69 Fastback 302 2v 3sp. trans.
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/View?u=1605599&a=12251632&p=44630868.jpg
 
1 - 6 of 6 Posts
Top