Vintage Mustang Forums banner
1 - 4 of 12 Posts

· Registered
1964 Mustang convertible
Joined
·
12 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Thinking of dropping one in my ‘65 conv., but I’m spooked by the small 206/206 cam. I want a smooth idle, it’s a cruiser, but I don’t want a total pussycat either.

Does anyone have a dyno sheet on it?

Thanks.
 

· Registered
1964 Mustang convertible
Joined
·
12 Posts
Discussion Starter · #5 ·
I have a cam like that in my 289. I custom ordered it like that from Comp Cams in 2002 or 2003. Funny to see that they are now used in Ford crate engines. It works well, with a 17-18 inch idle and pulls well throughout the RPM range. It doesn't like 6000 RPM (valve float) but that's probably a valve spring issue.
Is your cam a 110 LSA too? How does it sound? Does it sound like it’s cammed, or totally stock? Thanks.
 

· Registered
1964 Mustang convertible
Joined
·
12 Posts
Discussion Starter · #6 ·
They give you a short block that will handle 600 horsepower with a small cam and crappy heads. If you want that mellow of a cruiser you can do it with a refurbished roller block and cheap heads for a lot less. Look at the Blueprint stuff if that is what you want. Probably save $5000 and get fifty horsepower.
That makes sense, and part of my mental debate. It’s really paying for Ford’s quality control and warranty, and basically a new factory Ford engine. I’ve read so many reviews (I know, big mistake), where people have had this issue or that with crates, and I really don’t want to deal with it.

The other big thing is that I don’t want a lopey or bumpy idle. I’ve got that now with a cam that I designed myself 25 years ago, and it’s cold blooded and my family won’t drive it. The thing is, all the crate guys seem to go straight for the lopey cams. They start in high 220’s/230’s and go up from there. Ford does too after this engine! Weird, nothing in between. I can’t find anything between the Ford 206 and too big. Know of any? Thank you.
 

· Registered
1964 Mustang convertible
Joined
·
12 Posts
Discussion Starter · #8 ·
Do you have a hp/tq goal in mind?
375-400 hp, and 400+ tq. Would be fine. Actually, I think Ford’s advertised numbers would be fine (totally annoying that they won’t publish dyno sheet on complete engine btw), but as cheapbastard👆Pointed out, I’d be paying for a 600hp short block that may be tuned down so far you can’t even tell the power is there. I’m talking mostly sound and feel as you cruise.
 
1 - 4 of 12 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top