Vintage Mustang Forums banner
1 - 5 of 90 Posts

· Premium Member
1965 Mustang GT. 11.898 @ 113.646, all motor, three pedals
Joined
·
3,015 Posts
For simplicity and reliability, carburetors hands down. Besides, I think it’s part of the experience of driving these old cars. They have little quirks, and sometimes they’re a little grumpy. Kinda like the loose nut behind the wheel 😜
 

· Premium Member
1965 Mustang GT. 11.898 @ 113.646, all motor, three pedals
Joined
·
3,015 Posts
@W427

Thank you for sharing so much of your knowledge, experience, and wisdom. I learn something new every time you post 😎
 

· Premium Member
1965 Mustang GT. 11.898 @ 113.646, all motor, three pedals
Joined
·
3,015 Posts
For what it’s worth… damn near ANY carburetor (appropriate for the application) can be tuned for ‘better throttle response/fuel economy/cold starts’ blah blah blah.… it just depends on how much time and work you want to put into it. That said, fuel delivery is just one piece of the puzzle. Ignition, camshaft, intake, exhaust, gearing, torque converter (if applicable) all have to be ‘matched‘ for optimal results, regardless if you’re carbureted or injected.
 
1 - 5 of 90 Posts
Top