Vintage Mustang Forums banner

FNG with tons of questions

3723 Views 42 Replies 16 Participants Last post by  GenTso
This is my first post, and im accustomed to posting an into first, so ill just slap it on the front end of this questionare of sorts

First off, My name is Dan and im 22. I live in PA, and im NEW to vintage mustangs. I have alot to learn, and am willing. Currently, im deployed to Iraq, and will be home shortly wrench in hand.

Im no gear head by any means, but i just purchased a '67 6cyl auto coupe. Body is in good shape, just needs a little reworking. This is a project for me and my father (who has been not just a mustang enthusiest for years, but a ford enthusiest for years). He will be the brains behind this operation. However, i am doing all i can to learn up.

He had a 351w sitting in his garage he has donated to the project. We have both selected a T-5 convertion kit from Modern Driveline.

These are the parts i have selected for the car myself through help of one of my buddys here with me. The goal is a good combination of reliablility and streetability, with a little 'UMPH'.

Summit Cam - Duration 204/214 Lift .448"/.472"
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/SUM-K4400/

Summit Street/Strip Stage II Intake
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/SUM-226036/

Wolrd Products Windsor Sr. Iron Heads
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/WRL-053040-1/

Edelbrock 1411 Carb
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/EDL-1411/

Anyone good at estimating HP gain? Any suggestions are helpful to improve that number. Without the stroker, I'd like to be spending 2000, AT THE VERY MOST 2500.

Now my father had said about stroking it. I understand it adds cubes, am i right as guessing its more of a tourque thing?

I wont keep typing all the tons and tons of questions i have, ill get to them in due time im sure. Thanks for the help in advance.
See less See more
21 - 40 of 43 Posts
yes the cam is too small, use a high energy 268h or the summit hyd cam with 218 deg's duration and 480 lift.
Just so you all know, i am reading these, but its harder now. We just moved from where i was living here in iraq back to a main base. With that being said, im closer to home, however, it is difficult to get on the computer from here. Thanks again for the help, and when im here, ill be sure to keep you all updated. As it looks now, i might be home sooner than i thought to wrench on that stang:)
Welcome.

Read, read and then read some more. There isn't a question that you may have that has not been asked here before. Learn from the mistakes of all of us... well, not me, but most of these other guys ;)

Anything over 300 HP to the rear wheels is going to get you in trouble in a street car. "Trouble" comes in many forms. Speeding tickets, reckless driving tickets, car in a ditch wrapped around a tree tickets..... These cars are light enough that 300 HP will plant your back firmly in the seatback. As an example.... an OEM "low back" seat back by the looks of the pictures on the cardomain site.... 350 RWHP is a race car. With stock seats and a lap belt? Really? 350 RWHP means you'll need to stop faster/quicker than the OEM brake system ever dreamed of doing. 350 RWHP will twist the unibody frame design of the car without any strengthening. Sub-frame connectors are only a piece of the strengthening puzzle. Adding a passenger side torque box to your "doesn't have one of those" '67 is one area for chassis strengthening improvement.

Think about this for a second....

If you had an unlimited budget to build a 700 HP motor.... would it spin the rear tires faster/longer than a 250 RWHP "budget engine". Yes, it would, but guess what? The object of building a high HP motor is the ability to successfully transfer that power to the ground... to create rapid forward movement/acceleration, not to spin the tires. A kid on a moped could get to the finish line before you if you're still sitting at the starting line with your tires spinning.

To get those tires to stop spinning and "bite" requires money. You could simply slap some slicks on the back and the tires would bite, but then you'd snap your pinion gear. After you invested $2-3k in a new rearend, you'd snap your 1310 series driveshaft u-joints. After you upgraded your driveshaft to a 1330/1350 series unit, you'd likely grenade the tranny.

Do you see how/where this is going?

Building a car that will reliably transfer 300 RWHP to the ground is an "undertaking". Usually one that is not accomplished by a novice in short order.

The first advice I can give you is stop watching "over-haulin' reruns". 99% of those cars are pure junk that are nothing more than a showcase for Chip's one-off wheels that never see a rain drop. Along with "overhaulin'", wipe your arse with the aftermarket car magazines that are written only to support the advertisers within them. Little, if any, real knowledge can be gained from them and the money would be better spent on something softer/more absorbant.

Come here for your education/learning experience. We all live in the real world.

The next piece of advice is to plan on it costing more than you're currently envisioning. Likely, lots more. In the end you'll have a nice car that you'll have likely spent twice as much on as it'll ever be worth.
See less See more
Now that is a reply. That is definitely the reason why im reading and reading on these types of websites. Suggestions i get here are not taken lightly. I take alot of these suggestions from you higer posting fellows as seasoned veterens who have been in the jungle for years, as if i would sink or swim by what you all are saying. Thats the same reason i say thank you in every post. Ive been talking to more and more people here, now that were in more of a "community" kind of group. It would seem that i dont need 700RWHP and all that madness to get what i want. I want to be thrown in the back seat. I do want a little rear wheel spin on demand, yet at the same time controlable. It seems like my father is getting cold feet with this build too. He's giving me the 'You dont know what goes into this", and the "I havent done this kind of thing in years and i dont have all the answers". Reguardless, ive wanted this car for years, and id still like to see the task through. Please wise ones, guide me through my build. I was looking at the Grab-A-Track suspention upgrade.

http://www.mustangsplus.com/xcart/product.php?productid=1533&cat=2080&bestseller=Y

Should that take care of my suspention worries? What else may i need?

Ok, going with just the engine.. tell me what you would reccomend for my application. From what im gathering, 300rwhp would be more than sufficient for my application. is this correct? Or may i need less. I dont want the fastest mustang that has ever graced the local streets, because, i dont need that. I just was a great performing car, thats streetable and fun to drive.

Thanks again for all the help. Ill be back checking in soon enough. Also, if anyone would like to talk to me about this, when im around im always on AIM messenger. Feel free to get ahold of me.

amplifighterdan - Aim
See less See more
If you are looking at suspension upgrades and want to stay with the stock style suspension. I would recommend that you take the time and talk to John at http://www.opentrackerracingproducts.com/, he is a great guy to deal with.
the grab a trac suspension that you have linked is the exact one i have but i upgraded to the 1 1/8 sway bar. it is a great kit, but the struts are crap. would be a good idea to get them from somewhere else. and also recognize that the kit comes with polyeurethane bushings, they are good, but you have to make sure to use a lot of synthetic grease on them when installing so you wont get squeaks.
Ok, going with just the engine.. tell me what you would reccomend for my application.
Scrap the 351W idea.

While it can be made into a performance motor.... by dumping money into it..... right now it's likely more of a boat anchor than anything else.

Less money could be spent to get "more bang for your buck"....

Pickup a used, but "running good" 5.0 out of an 87-93 Mustang GT.

Performing the work to keep this engine operating on EFI is an undertaking, but not an overwhelming one. There are many people here who can guide you (and your dad) through this process. JamesW's Website offers a wealth of information. Going EFI, in my opinion will give you "I just want a great performing car, that's streetable and fun to drive."

If the EFI conversion task seems too daunting, slap an Edelbrock RPM intake/carb on the motor and ditch the EFI stuff for a future upgrade project.

While you're still in the planning stages, consider this.... You're going to spend a lot of money in order to take a "plain jane" '67 Coupe and quickly turn it into what you're looking for. Most people that modify their Mustang do the same thing you're doing, but slowly, over the course of years and in some cases a lifetime. To do it quickly will require a rapid infusion of cash.

Rear suspension/brakes - figure $500 on the low/budget end, $1500 for moderate and $3-8k for state of the art.

Front suspension/brakes - approx. the same as the rearend figures.

Engine - $2000 on the budget end, continually higher amounts for more reliability/performance.

Transmission - $500 to $3k

Electrical - It's likely that the wiring in your car is original. Unless you have no problems with continually troubleshooting electrical gremlins that live within your 40+ year old wiring, spend the money upfront to re-wire the entire car. See Painless Wiring as an example.

With the same train of thought as the wiring, plan for the worst that all of your hard metal brake lines are original and should be replaced also. Replacing the metal brake lines is not an expensive endeavor, but it will require a day or two to accomplish if you bend/flare your own lines.... considerably less time if you buy a pre-bent replacement brake line kit, but these kits don't often work well with upgraded braking systems as they're bent for stock applications.

Chassis - There is no "frame" on these cars. The frame structural pieces are integrated into the body panels to create what is called a "unibody" design. You've stated that the chassis is relatively "rust-free", let's hope so. Performance modifications to the drivetrain and suspension will quickly exceed the design integrity/capability of the unibody. If the unibody is weakened by rust, even quicker. After ensuring that the unibody is structurally sound, you'll want to improve a few areas of the basic design. Not until 1968 did the Coupe model receive a passenger side torque box. The torque box is located at the firewall/front frame rial/floorpan joint and strengthens the unibody from torsional, lateral and longitudinal "flex". You should add a passenger side torque box to your '67. The aftermarket offers you one. Subframe connectors, heretofore refered to as "SFC's" for ease of typing. The unibody design has front frame rails and rear frame rails. These rails do not meet, but are instead connected by the floorpan. SFC's bridge the 3.5 foot gap between the ends of the front and rear rails. SFC's should be welded on to better strengthen the chassis. You could bolt them on, but in my opinion it's like kissing your cousin... fun, but it ain't going to amount to anything.

Back to.... While you're still in the planning stages, consider this....

Do you really want to spend $10k and the next year of your life doing this? Can't you just enjoy the '67 for what it is in it's current condition? $10k would go a long way towards a late model Mustang GT that would require nothing more than gas and insurance.

I had this same talk with my son a few years ago while in similar circumstances. Single, he was working for KBR in Kandahar as a contractor. With time on his hands, no bills and a checking account balance that grew $10k a month, he got bored and decided "he wanted to build a car". We built his car....




..... but now he's wishing he'd bought a house instead.

One other point to consider is that every Mustang I've bought over the years has been from someone who got in over their head, lost interest and/or ultimately took a significant loss. Consider carefully the road you are about to embark upon.
See less See more
[Ok, there are many reasons for me wanting to do this car. I figure since alot of you are being kind enough to share, ill share a little extra.

The purchase of this car actually couldnt have came at better timing. I was(and still am) overseas. Girlfriend of 4 years, who i had intentions of marrying gave me the old dear john treatment, and started seeing someone else. Its a little more complex, but this is a car forum. Since then, i found this car, and this is my like 'freedom' project. Or, maybe its just my time to do me. Either way, its allready got my mind past that, and gives me soemthing to look forward to. Also, its gotta be cheaper than she was to maintain.

Three years agao, my father and i started doing a 4cyl to 8cyl convertion on my '86 Mustang. We tried to do it on a budget, and it nickel and dimed the hell out of both of us. All in all, it was just a waste of time and money. Something i do not plan on replicating here. But, before that me and my dad (well really my step-father) werent on good grounds. The car brought us together more so than i was with my actual mother. We went from not talking after their divorce, to a good healthy father/son relationship. He had a '67 back in the day, and he ended up wrecking it. Took the insurance money, swore he would never own another '67 (he loved his like no other) and bought a '69 Fairlane Cobra SCJ. That car is still in his posession to this day

Speaking of that point, i have said to him numerous times that we need to start working on that car. He told me after i get one resto under my belt, im allowed to 'take the lug nuts off'.

So there are personal reasons i want to restore this, and more so than any other is just simply, the '67 mustang is what got me interested in cars. I remember being taken to car shows when i was little, and being mad (because i was just a wee kid) standing around in the sun. But at those shows, i was always attracted to the mustang. Then my aunt bought a '66, baby blue, V6 auto, that was in relitively good shape. She sold it for peanuts to a dealer when she traded it in, however, i rode in that car for a few years, and i loved every aspect of it. Ive just always wanted this car, and now i want a little more car than the factory had to offer.

After reading numerous posts, i think im going to work on things other than driveline. I want to solid up the body, get the body where it needs to be. SFC, torque box, the body work needed. Disc brakes, track lock, rear gear ratio, ect. Just build up the driveline slowly. I got an engine stand, might as well put it to good use.

I can probally swap meet the parts i want cheaper here in the spring or something. I got all winter to work on the car before the driving season again, might as well do it right from the ground up.
See less See more
Sorry to hear about the dear john letter, but it may be for the best. Marriage is a lot tougher than a year long seperation.

What branch are you in?

I did 22 years in the Marines and retired aprox. 9 years ago. Seven years of my time was spent overseas. I know where you're coming from.

We're here when you need us.

Dave
Im in the PA Army National Guard. Guard aint what it used to be i can tell you that. Im in the 56th Stryker Brigade, the only National Guard Stryker Brigade, as an 11C (Infantry Mortarman).
DaveSanborn said:
Welcome.

Read, read and then read some more. There isn't a question that you may have that has not been asked here before. Learn from the mistakes of all of us... well, not me, but most of these other guys ;)

Anything over 300 HP to the rear wheels is going to get you in trouble in a street car. "Trouble" comes in many forms. Speeding tickets, reckless driving tickets, car in a ditch wrapped around a tree tickets..... These cars are light enough that 300 HP will plant your back firmly in the seatback. As an example.... an OEM "low back" seat back by the looks of the pictures on the cardomain site.... 350 RWHP is a race car. With stock seats and a lap belt? Really? 350 RWHP means you'll need to stop faster/quicker than the OEM brake system ever dreamed of doing. 350 RWHP will twist the unibody frame design of the car without any strengthening. Sub-frame connectors are only a piece of the strengthening puzzle. Adding a passenger side torque box to your "doesn't have one of those" '67 is one area for chassis strengthening improvement.

Think about this for a second....

If you had an unlimited budget to build a 700 HP motor.... would it spin the rear tires faster/longer than a 250 RWHP "budget engine". Yes, it would, but guess what? The object of building a high HP motor is the ability to successfully transfer that power to the ground... to create rapid forward movement/acceleration, not to spin the tires. A kid on a moped could get to the finish line before you if you're still sitting at the starting line with your tires spinning.

To get those tires to stop spinning and "bite" requires money. You could simply slap some slicks on the back and the tires would bite, but then you'd snap your pinion gear. After you invested $2-3k in a new rearend, you'd snap your 1310 series driveshaft u-joints. After you upgraded your driveshaft to a 1330/1350 series unit, you'd likely grenade the tranny.

Do you see how/where this is going?

Building a car that will reliably transfer 300 RWHP to the ground is an "undertaking". Usually one that is not accomplished by a novice in short order.

The first advice I can give you is stop watching "over-haulin' reruns". 99% of those cars are pure junk that are nothing more than a showcase for Chip's one-off wheels that never see a rain drop. Along with "overhaulin'", wipe your arse with the aftermarket car magazines that are written only to support the advertisers within them. Little, if any, real knowledge can be gained from them and the money would be better spent on something softer/more absorbant.

Come here for your education/learning experience. We all live in the real world.

The next piece of advice is to plan on it costing more than you're currently envisioning. Likely, lots more. In the end you'll have a nice car that you'll have likely spent twice as much on as it'll ever be worth.

As usually, Dave hit it right on the head. I couldn't agree more with his post.
Just wanted to let you all know that im still alive and kicking. I got stuck as a medical hold over when i got to the states. So untill im fixed, no going home. I did however "covertly" asertain my POV (private owned vehicle). Since my VW let me down, i brought down the '67. So much for staying low profile. Anyways, im out of country and working on the stang as much as i can from here. They do have a sweet 'Auto Hobby Shop' here that you can take your car to and rent a stall. Stall is $4.50 without lift, or $5.50 with lift per hour, they provide tools. Pretty good setup aswell, bled my breaks today, and still i have about 4" of travel in the pedal.. Looks like work is never over. I tried to bleed the lines, and i cracked off a nipple today. Kinda sucks. What do i expect, it lasted 42 years :). Anyways, talk to you all later
Just another update.. started doing standard maintence on the car. Ball joints were shot, shocks were shot, wheel cylinders, timing was off about 40 degrees. Oil leaks, freeze plug leak.. all small issues, being slowly corrected. Almost all the interior chrome is pitted, im going to see what some time on the buffing wheel does. Replaced the turn signal switch, cleaned up all the chrome as good as i could with some steel wool (which i have grown to love). Still looking for a hood and fender thats not going to cost oodles to ship, if i dont find one soon, ill try during winter. Car runs good, and its strong. So far happy with the car.. Got a lead on a 383 Stroker engine that is prof. rebuilt.. so maybe :)

If anyone has a donor car sitting around that you dont need the clutch/brake pedal, linkages and so forth, please let me know :)

Thank you

Dan
If anyone here has done an automatic to manual swap here, id sure appreciate a parts list for what ill need for the swap.. i got a tranny, now im just piecing it together. Also, we decided on working a 351w for the car, so our engine guessing game is over. Thanks again for all your help
The late model 5.0 advice is really good advice - especially if you throw a carb on it and an old distributor (there are numerous GOOD old distributor systems). This will get the engine done and working, and I think you will like it.

You can build a beast on the side (but that will require something better than a T5, IMO).

There's just too much to do on these cars to spend too much time on any one area. The 5.0 with carb should be GOOD, CHEAP, and QUICK (a combo that is usually impossible).
Its been a long time since i posted last, but i wanted to once again thank all of you for the advice. So far, not a bolt has been turned on the mustang since my return home in september. I was on medical hold untill mid decmeber, and i have done everything in my power to set up my garage. all i have done was clean out the two stall garage i aquired through a family member, got a 80gal single stage compressor (16.1cfm at 90psi), built the work bench, and tommrow hopefully i can get the sandblaster in the shop. Insulated the roof, installed heat (what a fiasco). But all in all, its soon getting to that time.. i also came up with a game plan finally for the way im going about getting this all done. I figure it will take about 2 years to do a complete resto by myself with the help of a few buddies and a few cases of beer for their labor. Again, thanks, and im sure i will be on more and more now that im back in the loop :)

-- Dan
Welcome.

Read, read and then read some more. There isn't a question that you may have that has not been asked here before. Learn from the mistakes of all of us... well, not me, but most of these other guys ;)

Anything over 300 HP to the rear wheels is going to get you in trouble in a street car. "Trouble" comes in many forms. Speeding tickets, reckless driving tickets, car in a ditch wrapped around a tree tickets..... These cars are light enough that 300 HP will plant your back firmly in the seatback. As an example.... an OEM "low back" seat back by the looks of the pictures on the cardomain site.... 350 RWHP is a race car. With stock seats and a lap belt? Really? 350 RWHP means you'll need to stop faster/quicker than the OEM brake system ever dreamed of doing. 350 RWHP will twist the unibody frame design of the car without any strengthening. Sub-frame connectors are only a piece of the strengthening puzzle. Adding a passenger side torque box to your "doesn't have one of those" '67 is one area for chassis strengthening improvement.

Think about this for a second....

If you had an unlimited budget to build a 700 HP motor.... would it spin the rear tires faster/longer than a 250 RWHP "budget engine". Yes, it would, but guess what? The object of building a high HP motor is the ability to successfully transfer that power to the ground... to create rapid forward movement/acceleration, not to spin the tires. A kid on a moped could get to the finish line before you if you're still sitting at the starting line with your tires spinning.

To get those tires to stop spinning and "bite" requires money. You could simply slap some slicks on the back and the tires would bite, but then you'd snap your pinion gear. After you invested $2-3k in a new rearend, you'd snap your 1310 series driveshaft u-joints. After you upgraded your driveshaft to a 1330/1350 series unit, you'd likely grenade the tranny.

Do you see how/where this is going?

Building a car that will reliably transfer 300 RWHP to the ground is an "undertaking". Usually one that is not accomplished by a novice in short order.

The first advice I can give you is stop watching "over-haulin' reruns". 99% of those cars are pure junk that are nothing more than a showcase for Chip's one-off wheels that never see a rain drop. Along with "overhaulin'", wipe your arse with the aftermarket car magazines that are written only to support the advertisers within them. Little, if any, real knowledge can be gained from them and the money would be better spent on something softer/more absorbant.

Come here for your education/learning experience. We all live in the real world.

The next piece of advice is to plan on it costing more than you're currently envisioning. Likely, lots more. In the end you'll have a nice car that you'll have likely spent twice as much on as it'll ever be worth.
Wow Dave,
That was beautiful.
I started the disassembly of the front end today.. the intention of the restoration as far as body work and clean up of rust is going to be in 1/3's.. from the front end to the end of the fender (and everything inbetween). So i tore down as far as i could without getting down to the nitty gritty and i have a few questions:

1 I have found a part i need to replace due to rust, but i do not know what in the world this part is called. Easiest way to describe it is if you look into the cars wheel well with the fender still on, its the panel most twords the rear. If the fender is off, it almost follows the line from the front of the cowl down. It has some kind of rubber material wrapped around the edge of it where it comes into contact with the fender. I dont know how to post pics or i would, but thanks ahead of time for giving it a guess without visual help

2 Is there any way to clean out the inner cowl without drilling out the welds. Im pretty sure there isnt, but id sure like to know if there is some fancy trick out there..

All and all it seems to be a straight forward disassembly. Phase 2 is to take out that 6banger. Gonna sell that to whom ever would like it. Along with the trans. 393 block/rotating assy was ordered today, so progress is moving along swell.
See less See more
1 I have found a part i need to replace due to rust, but i do not know what in the world this part is called. Easiest way to describe it is if you look into the cars wheel well with the fender still on, its the panel most twords the rear. If the fender is off, it almost follows the line from the front of the cowl down. It has some kind of rubber material wrapped around the edge of it where it comes into contact with the fender. I dont know how to post pics or i would, but thanks ahead of time for giving it a guess without visual help
Sounds like you're either talking about the outer cowl piece are the torquebox. If you have rust there, you are going to have it in other places. And if you start tearing into this piece, you're going to end up having to replace other rusty metal. Don't ask me how I know that.

My car a month after I got it home



You're going to need a MIG welder and some other small metal working tools to repair that rust. I'm not trying to scare you with the rust issue. Just make you aware that you might be in for a long road with rust repair.

You need to post some pictures so we can get a better idea of what you need and to help you. All you need to do to post pictures is use a picture hosting site. I use photobucket.com. It's free. Once I upload a picture there it gives me a URL where they have the photo. I copy that URL and paste it in the window that opens up when you click on the yellow colored photo icon at the top of the message box here in VMF. You should see your photo appear before you even submit your message.
See less See more
21 - 40 of 43 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top