Hi,
Some of you may remember part of this from earlier posts. Ford stamped the incorrect VIN on my car's sheet metal, but the "correct" VIN on the door tag. :-(
The visible VIN in the engine compartment is the following: 5R07A211672, the car is now in the body shop so I've been able to check the hidden VINs as well, both the driver's side and the passenger's side VINs are identical. Now the problem, the door tag has the following: 5R08A211672. The only difference is the door indicates it is a convert (which it is - and was from the factory), while all the engine compartment VINs have a "coupe" digits (07) in the VIN. Now the problem, the title used the door VIN. Should I point this out to the state? Should I have the engine compartment VINs "corrected"? Or should I just ignore it, and enjoy the car (what I'm planning to do, unless it will cause a problem.)
I've owned the car since about 1978. Given the extensive body work that is being done to repair the car from this month's accident I can safely say that I have inspected the car from the inside out and it has always been a convert, and it has not been patched together from multiple cars (although between 1965 and 1978 it apparently had a VERY hard life - rust and a significant accident).
John Harvey
Some of you may remember part of this from earlier posts. Ford stamped the incorrect VIN on my car's sheet metal, but the "correct" VIN on the door tag. :-(
The visible VIN in the engine compartment is the following: 5R07A211672, the car is now in the body shop so I've been able to check the hidden VINs as well, both the driver's side and the passenger's side VINs are identical. Now the problem, the door tag has the following: 5R08A211672. The only difference is the door indicates it is a convert (which it is - and was from the factory), while all the engine compartment VINs have a "coupe" digits (07) in the VIN. Now the problem, the title used the door VIN. Should I point this out to the state? Should I have the engine compartment VINs "corrected"? Or should I just ignore it, and enjoy the car (what I'm planning to do, unless it will cause a problem.)
I've owned the car since about 1978. Given the extensive body work that is being done to repair the car from this month's accident I can safely say that I have inspected the car from the inside out and it has always been a convert, and it has not been patched together from multiple cars (although between 1965 and 1978 it apparently had a VERY hard life - rust and a significant accident).
John Harvey