on newer mustangs, not classics

stang6992 · May 22, 2003

ok, im lookin into upgrading the daily driver in the corral... to a new gt convertible. i want the 99 or newer but i dont know if i can afford that right now unless i get a different job(im lookin for one) wonderin if anyone knows if there is a big difference in upgrading the 98 and older 4.6L over the newer ones? i see some price difference but not a lot in the mag. what one would be easier to do mods on and so on? i might just say screw it and drive the 92 until either it blows or until the '05 comes out and ill get that but who knows, just gathering info as of right now

gordon · May 22, 2003

I have driven both body styles and they found them very similar. Same engine, right? I have a 99 GT 'vert for sale, 10000 mile car for $17m .

Cloudbuster · May 22, 2003

I used to have a 2000 GT Convertible. I loved everything about the car.....that is except for the payment ::
Good luck with whatever you decide to do.

stang6992 · May 22, 2003

id consider but you are too far away and i dont have the money right now....

Guest · May 22, 2003

you'll find these Mustang improvements for 1999 interesting.
I don't think a bodyswap onto the earlier model is worthwhile.

bratpane · May 22, 2003

If I were you I'd drive the '92 until the '05 comes out. Start saving the money you'd be sticking into payments and you'll have a nice down payment to make.

Cheo · May 23, 2003

I used to own a 92, and believe me, I wish I own one now, my wife loved that car, I say, stick to the 92 until you're "really" ready to trade it. Frankly, I would keep the 92 as a driver and then get a classic if you want that..

stang6992 · May 24, 2003

i already got a classic, my 69 below..... the 92 has 135000 miles on it and it has NO BALLS and im sorry i need to have balls in what ever i drive b/c i love to drive and gutless cars are no fun

on newer mustangs, not classics

Our Vendors

Top Contributors this Month

Recommended Communities