Hello everyone,
I just wanted to hear some opinions on 66 Mustang emblems.
My emblems are old looking but in decent shape. How do judges look at emblems? Original or repro(Scott Drake) which is better?
I've looked over and compared the original 289 to the SD repro. Here is what I see. The original has much sharper corners and the 289 numbers are a little fatter.
http://images.kodakgallery.com/photos2498/1/59/13/63/4/8/804631359107_0_SM.jpg
My original running horse does not have an eye like the SD repro, and the far back leg is smaller on the original.
http://images.kodakgallery.com/photos2498/1/59/13/71/49/3/349711359107_0_SM.jpg
The mustang script looks identical on both the new SD repro looks cleaner.
http://images.kodakgallery.com/photos2498/1/59/13/53/95/8/895531359107_0_SM.jpg
The pics of my originals are small, if you want full size let me know.
Let me know your thoughts. Am I nuts, or just a crazed Mustang restorer?
Thanks
I just wanted to hear some opinions on 66 Mustang emblems.
My emblems are old looking but in decent shape. How do judges look at emblems? Original or repro(Scott Drake) which is better?
I've looked over and compared the original 289 to the SD repro. Here is what I see. The original has much sharper corners and the 289 numbers are a little fatter.
http://images.kodakgallery.com/photos2498/1/59/13/63/4/8/804631359107_0_SM.jpg
My original running horse does not have an eye like the SD repro, and the far back leg is smaller on the original.
http://images.kodakgallery.com/photos2498/1/59/13/71/49/3/349711359107_0_SM.jpg
The mustang script looks identical on both the new SD repro looks cleaner.
http://images.kodakgallery.com/photos2498/1/59/13/53/95/8/895531359107_0_SM.jpg
The pics of my originals are small, if you want full size let me know.
Let me know your thoughts. Am I nuts, or just a crazed Mustang restorer?
Thanks