Posted on a site here in Oz concerning conversions/modifications since many Mustangs here are converted to right hand drive.
Got me thinking about what makes a Mustang a "Mustang"? Some seem to think that as long as the basic body shape is intact you can replace anything and everything but the unibody and it's still a "Mustang" (and even replace a ton of sheetmetal too, just carefully avoid those VIN's :
. Others stick to a 100% stock view. Personally, I really don't know where I stand. Not opening the dreaded "rebody" issue, dare I mention it, just curious what other opinions on the subject are.
How many modifications can you make and still call it a Mustang? Is it defined by just the shape, as long as it "looks" like a Mustang from 10 feet is it still a Mustang, or is there more of a "soul" to the car than the body that makes it what it "is"? And if it is just the shape can I drop a Corvette body on a Pinto (OK it probably won't fit, but you get my point) and call it a "Corvette" cause that's what it "looks" like?
As I said, it's philosophical, not inferring right or wrong, just interested to see some other input/opinions..... could be interesting!
Got me thinking about what makes a Mustang a "Mustang"? Some seem to think that as long as the basic body shape is intact you can replace anything and everything but the unibody and it's still a "Mustang" (and even replace a ton of sheetmetal too, just carefully avoid those VIN's :
How many modifications can you make and still call it a Mustang? Is it defined by just the shape, as long as it "looks" like a Mustang from 10 feet is it still a Mustang, or is there more of a "soul" to the car than the body that makes it what it "is"? And if it is just the shape can I drop a Corvette body on a Pinto (OK it probably won't fit, but you get my point) and call it a "Corvette" cause that's what it "looks" like?
As I said, it's philosophical, not inferring right or wrong, just interested to see some other input/opinions..... could be interesting!