Vintage Mustang Forums banner

upgrading a non sinchro transmission on a 6 cylinder.

5K views 43 replies 12 participants last post by  toad  
#1 ·
I'm working on a 64.5 6 cylinder mustang and the transmission needs attention, I don't want to take the car out of operation so I'm thinking of replacing the transmission, I am planning to keep the original trans for numbers matching re-sell value and possible re installation in the future.

im considering the 3.03 with the Synchronized all forward gears.

is this a good idea?
 
#2 ·
Sounds like a good plan to me. You can get them cheap too. I think the 3.03 synchronized transmissions began for mustangs in 1967. Some VMF members probably have them laying around collecting dust and can't give them away. In your case it would be a nice and easy upgrade unless there's something about such a swap I don't know about.
 
#3 ·
consider this, yes you can swap to the 3.03 trans, if you wish. there is an adapter plate available so you can use the stock bell housing. however if you are going to swap transmissions, go for a T5 instead. you still need an adapter plate, also available, and you still need to change the drive shaft.

the advantage of the T5 is that you get two extra gears, one of them being an overdrive.
 
#9 ·
There is no adapter available to attach the 3.03 to the 64-65 170/200 engine since Mid-County went out of business. However, you can easily install a T5 5-speed, which will give you better performance AND better mileage.

Or you can simply learn to double-clutch, which will cost you $0. That's what I did, when I had my 66 Sprint. Let my Dad drive it when I got it together, and as we were lugging up a hill in 2nd I told him not to downshift, as 1st was non-synchro. He calmly double-clutched, slid it into first, and scooted up the hill. Yasee, when he was a kid transmissions didn't HAVE synchros, in any gear.
 
#18 ·
22GT you say when your Dad was a kid transmissions didn't have synchro in any gear? I'm mainly a Ford guy on older (really old now) cars. The Model A (28-31) was upgraded to have a real transmission rather than the multiple pedal with hand throttle Model T. The Model T trans was 3 speed non synchro. For the 32 Model the Model B was 4 cyl, Model 18 was the first Flathead V8. AFAIK the trans was 3 speed, synchro 2nd and 3rd. The Flathead with several modifications was used from 32-53 models. The transmission internals were pretty much similar 32-53 with change to column shift in 40, open drive in 49 and bell housing changes. Strongest trans was the 39, last floor shift. I would guess Ford wasn't the first to use synchros in automobile transmissions.
 
#11 ·
I definitely have no interest in 5 speed transmissions.

I definitely want a 3 speed, I was considering upgrading to syncro on 1st gear, but I didn't know I would need an adapter plate. and i dont want to change the drive-shaft.

im happy with my curent original 3 speed transmission w/o syncro, Except, it leaks from the rear yoke, needs a new yoke and rear bushing. I dont want to disable the car while i rebuild it, so im looking for a simple cheep way to pop in another used 3 speed.
 
#13 ·
Well, you can't directly replace your 2.77 with a 3.03. They simply have nothing in common, not the input shaft, mounting flange, output shaft. Nothing.

You could simply buy a 2.77, already rebuilt, and put it in.

Of course, any decent trans shop could replace the rear seal and bushing without removing the trans. It's a pretty simple job, prob'ly only take a couple hours. Why not do that? Car in the shop one day. If you had the right tools, you could do it yourself.
 
#14 ·
Instead of a adapter, would a 3.03 bell housing off a '68 200 bolt up to toads block? If so I literally have one laying in the floor doing nothing but collecting dust.
 
#20 ·
Alright well taking the car to the shop is not an option for me, I am set on doing all the work myself, but I work slow and I wouldn't be surprised if the trans needs more work than I thought.

Ware could I find a cheep used one to swap in while I work on the original?
 
#21 ·
#22 · (Edited)
When I was 17 I rebuilt the 2.77 in my first Mustang. Took an afternoon. Even if you do the work yourself, it should be a weekend project. The only consideration might be if you get it apart and discover the gears are trashed. If it is running now, and your only problem is the leak, then the gears are not trashed.

Seriously, if the leak and the worn-out yoke are the only problems, you are looking at a Saturday morning project. Don't even need to remove the trans from the car. Really.

Oh, for some reason the 2.77 slip yoke is often worn out, so no surprise there.

Oh, and My Dad was a kid in the was a couple years too young for WWII, and was what we'd now call "working class". Synchro gears were a feature of nicer cars, that he couldn't afford. Heck, even in my time, we had a huge dump truck (bought off the county when they got new ones) that had no synchros. Miss a shift in that bad boy and the shift lever would break your wrist.
 
#24 ·
Sorry, 22GT, thought you said no cars had synchro back when your Dad was driving. Ya my Dad was working class, walking streets selling books to pay for college. His dad had a country store in Lisle North Dakota (100+ population).
 
#28 · (Edited)
thank you everyone for helping,

I think Im going to pull the transmission and rebuild it, absent a replacement showing up someplace.

I have never worked on a transmission so I was afraid I would need to disable the car for a long period of time.

I have seen so many people selling half completed project cars on e-bay, and you never know what life will throw at you so it scares me to dissemble a major component of the car.

but you guys make it seem like a doable project, :)
 
#30 · (Edited)
Yup......that's the kit I got.
Unfortunately in addition to worse than shot synchro rings the synchro spacers were beyond shot with only 1/2 of ONE of the three still identifiable.

Image


These do NOT come in the kit and the ones in the photo are the ones I got.
They are not drop in replacements so I had to grind the sides and tops to make them fit but I think they are a vast improvement over the earlier ones made of chintzy formed steel.
If you decide to DIY TAKE PHOTOS paying particular attention to shift fork and gear cluster orientations!
 
#38 · (Edited)
I found this yoke for less than half price, Im just a little unsure if its the right one. It says its for a C4.

http://www.amazon.com/Ford-Transmis...WJS0/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1452929025&sr=8-1&keywords=drive+shaft+yoke+mustang
That is for the bigger trans. The tubular part and the lugs for the U joint are nearly twice the size of your itty-bitty 2.77 slip yoke. It's cheap because it's an aftermarket part and fits about a spazillion cars, with the 3.03 3-speed, the Ford Design 4-speed, The Warner T10 4-speed, the C4 automatic, and the AOD automatic overdrive. You couldn't get that onto your car with a sledgehammer. Sorry.