Vintage Mustang Forums banner

My panhard bar build thread

9K views 29 replies 11 participants last post by  Federico Garza  
#1 · (Edited)
Well, its been a long time since I wanted to do either a watts or a panhard bar for my 64.5 coupe, ive been following the excellent threads here and at corner carvers, and started my project 2 weeks ago.

I went with the panhard bar because I felt it was a little less complicated to fabricate with the tools equipment that I have access to.

Im still working on how to mount the pass bracket , either to the shock plate ala maier or to the leaf spring itself. The bar has 5" of adjustability.

Parts list:
(2) 3/4-16" Rod ends
(2) 3/4 to 5/8 bronze bushings
(3) ft. 2"x2"x 1/8" square tubing
(2) U channel 1 5/8" interior width x 6" long


Image





Image



Image
 
#8 ·
Nice! I like the fact that you built adjustability into it. I believe most people really have no idea on exactly how a Panhard bar works. My I suggest this book? Has a very good section on it's use. Forget what the reviews say. I think they're just looking for quick answers only.

Image
Amazon.com: Stock Car Setup Secrets HP1401 (9781557884015): Bob Bolles: Books
Thanks for the link, and yes theres really no good solid tech out there, I read a little about the roll centers, and how on a leaf spring car you cant have compiting roll centers.

Saw a dart set up on CC's with the bar way below the axel centerline (actually bellow the leaf springs), so Im really curious to experiment the different settings, albeit this one will never see a track, 100% street car.
 
#11 ·
I decided to research and clarify what moving the bar/roll center up and down would do since I'm getting close to putting mine in. Thought it may be helpful to add that info here:

Adjusting the panhard up, moves the roll center up, and causes the springs to feel stiffer, giving less body roll, and a greater tendency to oversteer.

Adjusting down, causes springs to feel softer, giving more body roll, and greater tendency to understeer.

I could see where this could take some time to tune depending on tires and such...
I'm running 245's up front and 285's out back, so I'm kinda thinking I should move the bar up a little to balance the car a little... at least as a starting point. i dunno....
 
#13 ·
I installed a Maximum Motorsports Panhard on a '86 TBird TurboCoupe. The car was built up using a Mustang 8.8 rear and a MM coilover front suspension, Vortech blown 331 and a T5 trans. The Panhard allowed much higher cornering speeds, and freeway entrance ramps were a joy to take. They was virtually no body lean, and the car had just a hint of oversteer. The car also had a mostly stock 4 link, which normally has a very high roll center.
There is some thought as to what side of the car to attach the frame end to, with MM favoring one side and others, ie, Griggs, favoring the other side. Something to do with engine torque I think.
Just be sure the Panhard is adjusted perfectly horizontal and normal ride height This will minimize any side to side movement if the rear axle assembly as the springs deflect through their normal range of motion.
 
#14 ·
There is some thought as to what side of the car to attach the frame end to, with MM favoring one side and others, ie, Griggs, favoring the other side. Something to do with engine torque I think.
Thats due to the rotation of the driveshaft, the body mount should be on the driver side to counter the natural twisting of the axle from that force... based on what I've read so far.

There's certainly more to suspension and going fast than I realized the more I dig in to how to set up a car properly.
 
#21 ·
I just made a quick calculation, so it's very well possible that I overlooked something.

Also, some of the panhard bars I've seen for circle track cars are very different in design from the ones you'll find on a street or road coarse car. For a car that needs handle predictable to the left, right and straight ahead, you want something that just keeps the axle in place and limit other side effects as much as possible. That means a long bar that's mounted horizontal. Circle track cars that only take left hand corners of a certain radius, they sometimes (or often) use very short ones mounted at an angle. In that case, the vertical forces can be much higher and you can get much bigger benefits, but only for that particular type of turn.
 
#24 · (Edited)
Time for more updates:

Finally finished the pass side bracket, wich is mounted to the leaf spring

Image


Drivers side (frame mount is done also)

Image


Cleaerence between the rod and the back of the diff is about 1/2"


Image



Things pending:

1.- Shorten the rod 3/4"-1 1/2"
2.-Cut out the tailpipes in order to run the brace of the PHB from the drivers side frame rail to the passenger side rail
3.- Fabricate spacers for the rod ends
4.-Powder coat everything
5.-Weld in the assembly
6.-Reroute pipes, as they are right now they will not permit the bar to be parallel to the axel.

Now a question for the experts im swaping in an 8.8 diff, should I worry with the rear of the 8.8 clearence to the PHB????

That would be the only thing that would hold me back on putting the assembly in and welding it...
 
#25 ·
You might want to rethink the leaf spring mount for the panhard bar. The panhard can be subjected to many thousand pounds of force. If the panhard was moved lower or higher the resulting forces would leverage twist on the spring. This will prevent you from having any adjustment of the roll center. This is the first application I have seen leaf spring mounted, admitting very limited experiance here.
 
#27 ·
From CC land... "It clamps to the spring with two 0.5" bolts and two 0.4375" (7/16") bolts. The top portion of the mount is in two parts, one of which doubles as the rear anti-swaybar end link mount on that side (based on the seat of the pants impression at the Jefferson 500 in May the anti-sway is probably coming off though). The photos above (post # 140) show this mount before it was trimmed, drilled, and painted. I did it this way because packaging the PHR on the MOPAR is difficult with the rear shocks and gas tank where they are. "

Image
 
#26 ·
I too had concerns about that. One thing that helps is the clamp is close to the axle mount plate, so it adds a bit more rigidity to the spring. The further away from the axle mount the more flexible/torsion the leaf spring becomes.