G'day to all.
At 43, I was too young to buy a 1st gen Mustang.
I'm just curious about some of the old timers on this forum and how long they've owned the same Mustang and did they buy it from new?
Is there such a thing as a completely original and unmolested classic and still owned and driven by the first owner?
I mean one where nothing has been repaired or changed or repainted etc.
I'd like to hear from some of you.
Spoke to a Shelby authority early this year at our yearly "special" gathering. The usual assortment of trailer queens were there also, Shelby's, Hertz, Boss'.
The 70 Boss there was the Australian Concours winner ...it still had the original Polyglas tyres on it ...and they looked in good nick!
Anyway he told me that there are only 15 Shelby's in the country (AU) of which 8 are "H's". All LHD I believe.
I also drove down a street near home last year ...it was a nice day and a gut had what looked like 2 Shelby's basking in his driveway. No "CLONE" writing to be seen anywhere.
Is it just out of respect that owners advertise that their cars are clones by putting "CLONE" after eg: GT350 or is it another reason? Do any of you guys do it? Is this practice frowned upon? or is it personal preference?
Downunder here we have the XW and XY GTHO's.
I think about 250 of each were made so Allan Moffat could race them at Bathurst. These are almost priceless today.
On top of that there were several thousand GT's made for general consumption. Even these are starting to get a bit expensive. So as you can imagine, there are heaps of XW and XY GT clones for sale for a fraction of the cost.
It has never been a practice to mark these Aussie vehicles in any way to indicate that they are clones, but for some weird reason I frowned upon the guy with the 2 Shelby copies (I'm assuming), for not labelling them properly.
When did this labelling thing start?
cheers to all.
At 43, I was too young to buy a 1st gen Mustang.
I'm just curious about some of the old timers on this forum and how long they've owned the same Mustang and did they buy it from new?
Is there such a thing as a completely original and unmolested classic and still owned and driven by the first owner?
I mean one where nothing has been repaired or changed or repainted etc.
I'd like to hear from some of you.
Spoke to a Shelby authority early this year at our yearly "special" gathering. The usual assortment of trailer queens were there also, Shelby's, Hertz, Boss'.
The 70 Boss there was the Australian Concours winner ...it still had the original Polyglas tyres on it ...and they looked in good nick!
Anyway he told me that there are only 15 Shelby's in the country (AU) of which 8 are "H's". All LHD I believe.
I also drove down a street near home last year ...it was a nice day and a gut had what looked like 2 Shelby's basking in his driveway. No "CLONE" writing to be seen anywhere.
Is it just out of respect that owners advertise that their cars are clones by putting "CLONE" after eg: GT350 or is it another reason? Do any of you guys do it? Is this practice frowned upon? or is it personal preference?
Downunder here we have the XW and XY GTHO's.
I think about 250 of each were made so Allan Moffat could race them at Bathurst. These are almost priceless today.
On top of that there were several thousand GT's made for general consumption. Even these are starting to get a bit expensive. So as you can imagine, there are heaps of XW and XY GT clones for sale for a fraction of the cost.
It has never been a practice to mark these Aussie vehicles in any way to indicate that they are clones, but for some weird reason I frowned upon the guy with the 2 Shelby copies (I'm assuming), for not labelling them properly.
When did this labelling thing start?
cheers to all.